October 07, 2005

That $%$&#*@ McCain!

Though the veins on Mark Levin's forehead are still throbbing incessantly, he acknowledges the role that the John McCain's "Gang of 14" may have played in the Miers nomination by keeping the judicial filibuster tactic alive.

"Lest we forget, Majority Leader Bill Frist and the overwhelming majority of his Republican colleagues were poised to defeat the unprecedented and frequently used (or threatened) filibuster tactics that had been unleashed against President Bush by the Democrats to weaken his appointment power. The big media editorialized against it. George Will wrote at length (albeit unpersuasively) against it (see here and my response to him here). And Bill Kristol's favorite presidential candidate in 2000, John McCain, the leader of the Gang of 14, was all over the media making clear he would torpedo such an effort. And that's exactly what he did. This in no way excuses the president's blunder in choosing Miers. But the ideological confrontation with the likes of Senator Charles Schumer and the Democrat left that many of us believe is essential, including Will and Kristol, was made much more difficult thanks to the likes of McCain and the unwillingness to change the rule before any Supreme Court vacancy arose. This president has been poorly served by his Republican "allies" in this regard. Bush is the first president who has had to deal with an assault of this kind on his constitutional authority. And unless and until the filibuster rule is changed, a liberal minority in the Senate will have the upper hand.

Today the president would have to persuade seven of the most unreliable Republican senators to trigger the so-called nuclear option in order to clear the way for an up-or-down vote for, say, a Luttig. It is not at all certain or even likely that Lincoln Chafee, Olympia Snowe, and/or Susan Collins — the most liberal of the seven — would have voted for the Senate rule change for the purpose of confirming a solid originalist. And it's likely the Democrat leadership would have succeeded in convincing at least some (if not most) of the seven Democrat moderates to oppose a rule change. I have no doubt that this was part of the White House's political calculation. And it's possible the president didn't want to limp into this fight. That's no excuse. But McCain — who wants to be president and has now endorsed Harriet Miers — and his cadre must not escape scrutiny for their blunder."

H/T: Hugh Hewitt

Related: Conservatives Won't Trust Bush, But They'll Trust The Senate?

Also on the subject of quag-Miers:

- BeldarBlog rebutts Charles Krauthammer's latest.
- Newt tries to calm Conservatives

Posted by: Gary at 10:43 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 445 words, total size 3 kb.

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
16kb generated in CPU 0.515, elapsed 2.4619 seconds.
113 queries taking 2.4467 seconds, 236 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.