September 22, 2005
Combat yes! Consensus no!
Gary Andres'
column in the Wash Times today looks at the current trend of Democrat strategies and shakes his head. Instead of harnessing Liberal enthusiasm to champion its own legislative agenda, the party has resorted to simply trying to tear down that of the Republicans. Message to Dems: Voters don't like that!
Republicans and conservatives sometimes sentimentally yearn for the good old days, wondering why Democrats don't play by the old rules. No such luck. Some of the loudest and most influential voices in the Democratic Party -- such as Simon Rosenberg of the New Democratic Network, and blogger Markos Moulitsas from the Daily Kos -- care more about creating acrimony than alternatives. These activists dominate party voters, volunteers and contributors, and their message to Democratic congressional leaders is clear -- combat yes, consensus no.
As Howard Fineman wrote in Newsweek recently, Mr. Rosenberg and his new Democratic allies argue success lies "not (in) ideological purity but combativeness." The "left" wants Democratic lawmakers to erect barriers blocking the party's move to the center and to hamper cooperation; congressional leaders have clearly heard the request and already started construction -- a political public-works project that won't stop anytime soon.
Someday about five to ten years from now, somebody is going to write a book about the continuing decline of the Democrats and an appropriate title would be something along the lines of "The Un-making Of A Political Party".
Then again, maybe a better title would be "The Democratic Party: Stuck On Stupid".
Posted by: Gary at
07:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 2 kb.
September 21, 2005
Political Quiz
Didn't care all that much for the questions, but I guess this is pretty much correct.
h/t: The Llamas
Posted by: Gary at
11:21 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 2 kb.
1
yeah, according to this little test, i'm branded a socialist now (does that mean i have to grow a beard?) wtf? it said i'm MUCH more socially permissive than economically permissive (no big shock) but since nixon took us off the gold standard and money only has worth because we all agree that it does, i think i can live with that.
Posted by: the most rev. jack habit at September 22, 2005 09:32 AM (yT+NK)
2
You leftwinger you!
Check out mine.
http://rightwingnation.com/index.php/2005/09/20/265/
Posted by: rightwingprof at September 22, 2005 09:58 AM (/IE5Q)
3
I took it. You are such a liberal
Posted by: Ryan S. at September 22, 2005 11:02 AM (8pUTL)
4
geez... let's come up with a different name then liberal as it makes me sound like a staunch supporter of the demo-hacks.
Posted by: the most rev. jack habit at September 22, 2005 12:25 PM (yT+NK)
5
Call me a Republican: On the "famous people chart," my results circle hovers right over Ronald Reagan's heart. (Awwww...)
Glad to see me on here, Gar?
Posted by: Georgia Girl (gfsil) at September 23, 2005 06:10 PM (M2L+3)
6
The old place wasn't the same without ya. Love the email address.

No go watch "Battlestar Galactica"!!!
Posted by: Gary at September 23, 2005 08:44 PM (97wWn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Get "Lost" Tonight
Time for one of the very best shows on television to premiere. If you didn't watch last season, it's not too late. ABC willing be showing a one-hour "summary" special at 8pm EST that will bring anyone not familiar with the show up to speed enough to understand what's going on. The new episode is at 9pm, which is its new time slot.
OK, guys, still not convinced? Click the "read more" link for a better incentive...
more...
Posted by: Gary at
04:16 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 89 words, total size 1 kb.
The Left Regroups With New "Strategery"
Liberal Oasis has
a lengthy post lamenting "What went wrong?" with the Roberts nomination and lays out a plan for how to attack the next nomination.
Personally, I found a lot of this fascinating. I take the post's basic premise to be "we didn't define the nominee or attack him aggressively enough, and we lost". Here are a few examples of how they think things should go differently with the next nominee (emphasis is theirs):
more...
Posted by: Gary at
02:48 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 664 words, total size 4 kb.
President, Senators Meet To Discuss Nominee Possibilities
Bush
met with Senate leaders this morning to go over some potential candidates for Justice O'Connor's spot on the Supreme Court, but the President had his poker face on and wasn't giving any indication of how he was leaning. This of course drove Democrats (and official pain-in-the-ass Republican Arlen Specter) nuts.
Democrat Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who has already voiced his opposition to John Roberts, was pretty peeved at the prospect of Bush picking one of the judges he and his fellow partisan hacks had been filibustering over for the Appeals Court.
Reid said Tuesday he would view it as a "poke in the eye with a sharp stick" if Bush nominated any of the 10 appeals court nominees whom Democrats blocked in recent years, including some who were later confirmed. That group includes federal appellate judges Owen and Brown.
Man, what I wouldn't give to see Dirty Harry Reid wearing an eye-patch!
Posted by: Gary at
11:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 166 words, total size 1 kb.
The "Stuck On Stupid" Insta-lanch has begun
Due to a post by the
Puppy Blender last night, we are seeing the wide distribution of this
video of General Honore verbally smacking down an idiot reporter at a New Orleans press conference, saying "You are stuck on stupid!", which is something I've been waiting for someone...anyone...to say to the media for years.
The transcript of the whole press conference is here, courtesy of Radio Blogger, and linked by Vodkapundit.
And thus, a new catchphrase was born.
UPDATE: Slublog updates the WWII guy poster and a variation from Ace of Spades. The more this catches on, the more pissed off the media is going to get.
Posted by: Gary at
09:30 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This man should be the next predident.
Posted by: David at September 21, 2005 09:50 AM (6wTpy)
2
Don't knee jerk about Honore becoming President. It was a timely and excellent remark. I would like many more of same. Republicans are always pussies, no match for the sewer sniper demon-rats.
Posted by: Tatiana at September 21, 2005 10:06 AM (dJJ6u)
3
First heard this on Laura Ingraham this morning and they were joking (and serious) that he should take Scott McClellan's place as White House Spokesman.
Posted by: Wordsmith from Nantucket at September 21, 2005 03:18 PM (nrGCx)
4

i am all for that. he should be the next president!
Posted by: AShley at September 24, 2005 08:11 AM (UPWcN)
5

i am all for that. he should be the next president!
Posted by: AShley at September 24, 2005 08:11 AM (UPWcN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Swirl Of Speculation Over Next SCOTUS Nominee
John Hinderaker at Powerline
looks at the latest NY Times report that suggests the choice will be a woman. Considering that it's the
Times doing the reporting, I'm inclined now to think that it
won't be a woman. But should it be someone outspoken like Janice Rogers Brown, I agree with Hinderaker: Bring.It.On!
I agree that Brown would probably be unable to treat Dem Senators like Biden, Durbin and Kennedy with the elaborate respect that they don't deserve, and that her hearing would produce fireworks like we haven't seen in a long time. But so what? She is much smarter than her Democratic opponents, and she'd do fine. And, more important, the views she would be defending are held by the vast majority of Americans. Let's go ahead and have that fight, is my view.
And Manuel Miranda
writes in OpinionJournal.com today about the Dem strategy of "smear and intimidate" that may have a significant influence on who the nominee will be.
Don't hold your breath for an anouncement until the final roll call in the Senate for Roberts. How Dems vote on him will probably also have an influence on who is nominated.
Posted by: Gary at
09:14 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
September 20, 2005
Tolkien Geek Update
Fellowship of the Ring, Book One, Chapter Eleven
is posted.
Which is a freaking miracle, considering BLOGGER SUCKS ASS!
Posted by: Gary at
11:20 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Ted Koppel Imitates "Seinfeld"
Koppel on Peter Jennings:
"I am not gay, not that there's anything wrong with that...From the time I first met Peter 41 years ago, until our final meeting a few weeks ago, I felt a thrill whenever I saw him."
Uh...M'kay.
h/t: NealeNews
Posted by: Gary at
04:51 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
Jeez, Those Dems Are A Nasty Bunch
The fellas over at Dog Snot Diaries have been poking their sticks at the Lefty blogs and stirred up a hornets nest on the topic of Michelle Malkin. Really vile stuff.
What is it with these Democrats these days? I swear, if I woke up everyday so full of bile and rage, I think I'd probably kill myself. Go check out these mean old meanies here.
Posted by: Gary at
04:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 80 words, total size 1 kb.
Dan Rather Laments "Atmosphere Of Fear" In Today's Newsrooms
Fear of
accountability, that is.
However, poor Dan is now pushing his corporate conspiracy theories to explain why he couldn't get away with making wild accusations of a sitting President based on fabricated "evidence" even he agrees is suspect. Of course, in sticking to his Bush TANG story, Rather claims that even though the proof is fake the story is accurate.
Yeah, OK Dan. You just stick to your guns there. You see, Dan thinks he was merely hung out to dry by the powers that be because they couldn't take the heat. Addressing the Fordham Univ. School of Law in Manhattan, he spoke wistfully of the good old days of broadcast news.
"There was a connection between the leadership and the led . . . a sense of, 'we're in this together,"' Rather said. It's not that the then-leadership of CBS wasn't interested in shareholder value and profits, Rather said, but they also saw news as a public service. Rather said he knew very little of the intense pressure to remove him in the early 1970s because of his bosses' support.
Don't worry, Dan. The leadership and the "journalists" of the MSM are still in cahoots. It's just that you so profoundly lost your credibility last September, your bosses understood there was no getting it back.
Posted by: Gary at
12:10 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 233 words, total size 2 kb.
1
There should be an atmosphere of fear, especially in the credibility department. There isn't a day that passes that another article of media bias does not arise in the blogosphere. There are numerous accounts of this liberal bias and misrepresentation that I have evidenced on my site. One would think with the public aware of the bias and deception these reporters of the MSM would not only be in fear, but also begin to report honestly.
Posted by: Antonio Mendez at September 20, 2005 08:34 PM (pOe/w)
2
There should be an atmosphere of fear, especially in the credibility department. There is not a day that passes that another article of media bias does not arise in the blogosphere. There are numerous accounts of this liberal bias and misrepresentation that I have evidenced on my site. One would think with the public aware of the bias and deception these reporters of the MSM would not only be in fear, but also begin to report honestly.
Posted by: Antonio Mendez at September 20, 2005 08:34 PM (pOe/w)
3
this is not an argument starter, OR a defense of rather, but all news is biased. i know right-wingers say they like fox news because of the fair and balanced speil, but c'mon, you really like it because, in your eyes, they are reporting "the truth." just like looser lefties gravitate toward al "i used to be a comic but now i'm a political expert" franken on accout of their belief in his "journalistic mertit," right-leaning folks do the same in their quest for "real reporting" independent from the MSM. there's nothing wrong with that, in fact, it makes perfect sense: people look to news sources representative of their particular belief system because hearing "their news" read over the airways validates, in their eyes, it's authenticity. i just don't buy the fair and balanced act, for either side. right wingers like right wing news because it's their people, speaking their language, about their cause and the same goes for those on the left. if there was a "wacko peace-nut mother earth-lovin' punk rock news channel," i'd no doubt take that as the gospel truth as well. personally, i'd just as soon read the morning's "doonesbury" and turn the tv to catch an old "dr. who" episode on the BBC.
Posted by: the most rev. jack habit at September 21, 2005 09:38 AM (yT+NK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Intoxicated By Her Own Notoriety, Cindy Turns Her Guns On Hillary
Not content be an obsure footnote in history, Cindy Sheehan has
turned the pressure up on the NY Senator to appease the anti-war Left.
War protester Cindy Sheehan came to New York last night with a blunt warning for Senator Clinton: End your support for the war in Iraq or else.
Visiting New York City for the first time since leaving her campsite outside President Bush's vacation ranch in Crawford, Texas, Ms. Sheehan told a packed audience in a Brooklyn church that Mrs. Clinton "knows the war is a lie" but because of her political ambitions refuses to voice any opposition.
This will definitely put a crimp in Hillary's current foreign policy kabuki-dance aimed at fooling enough moderate voters into thinking she can be trusted with America's security. The Kos crowd is watching closely, as are the MoveOn.org and Soros-funded "America Coming Together" groups.
Will Sheehan demand a "sit-down" with Sen. Clinton as well? Only if the journalists are there. And they have to much of an interest in her success to do that.
Posted by: Gary at
10:24 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 194 words, total size 1 kb.
Best Halloween Costume...Ever

Sent via email from my older brother (no, that's not him in the picture).
Posted by: Gary at
09:03 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
Germany's Election: Symptoms Of The Disease
Although the result of Sunday's Parliamentary election seems eerily familiar to Americans, the political realities in Germany (and the EU in general) reveal much bigger problems.
Pam Meister reviews Mark Steyn's take on the state of Europe and makes a sober observation:
It's like a burning car wreck--we can't do anything about it but stare as those involved suffer until the fire truck arrives. Will the fire truck arrive in time?
I think in this case the firefighters are on strike.
Posted by: Gary at
07:18 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 91 words, total size 1 kb.
September 19, 2005
Giants V. Saints
UPDATE: 27-10 GIANTS WIN!!!

----------------------------------------------

Tonight at 7:30 - the "alternate" Monday Night Football game. I know this was supposed to be a Saints home game and Katrina changed all that. I know the Saints are the sentimental favorite in this nationally televised game. I know the country will be rooting for New Orleans because of that city's recent hardship.
But I also know I could give a shit because this is FOOTBALL baby and I hope Big Blue puts a world of hurt on these guys - winning by three touchdowns!!!!!
And of course if the Saints win, I'll say I was secretly rooting for New Orleans because I felt sorry for them.
Posted by: Gary at
03:04 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
1
not a bad start for the new joisey giants, but the season gets A LOT rougher than the 0-2 cardinals and 1-1 saints. i know, i know, my beloved eagles lost a pathetic monday night game to atlanta and michael "mr. herpes" vick, and our win over SF was inevitable, but i have it on good authority that we'll be trampling your identitiy crisis-having giants (new york or joisey? they just can't make up their minds!) both games. ain't football season THE BEST!!!
Sun., Nov. 20 - at jimmy hoffa's final resting place
Sun., Dec. 11 - at the football "mecca" of north america - THAT'S RIGHT BABY!!! YOU'RE LOUSY GIANTS ARE GONNA GET A FULL TASTE OF WHAT IT'S LIKE TO LOOSE AT DA 'LINK!!!!!
Posted by: the most rev. jack habit at September 20, 2005 10:36 AM (yT+NK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sound Of Crickets Drowns Out U.S. Coverage Of Afghan Election
I swear. You really have to search - and I mean really search - to find any story on yesterday's historic Parliamentary elections in Afghanistan.
Afghan voters had a 50% turnout, there was no major violence reported and women were pulling off their burqas at the polling stations in celebration. While former Taliban thugs threatened to disrupt the election, the day was a peaceful one.
What patrolling Canadian soldiers witnessed instead on Sunday was a virtual national holiday. Afghans casually strolled down the streets of their two major cities after all non-essential traffic was ordered off the road, on their way to do something they thought would ensure a brighter future -- vote.
"Everyone is so happy. It's like we are waiting for Christmas to come," said Abdullah Shahood, a 22-year-old poll observer for candidate Abdul Razziq.
"Everyone is optimistic."
I mean, this is BIG news!
Hmmm. Now why would the U.S. media be ignoring something so significant? Oh yeah, I forgot. They're too busy covering the big anti-Bush speech that Bill Clinton made yesterday. What the hell was I thinking?
Posted by: Gary at
02:28 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 199 words, total size 1 kb.
1
He seems to have really made his rounds this weekend on tv. I only caught him on Meet the Press.
Posted by: Wordsmith from Nantucket at September 19, 2005 03:06 PM (nrGCx)
2
Actually, I've seen more angry conservatives bitching about how awful it is that Clinton said this than I have actual mentions of Clinton's words. Why is it that the Delusional Right doesn't actually read the HLSDBKPRMSM (Hateful Liberal Socialist Democratic Baby Killing Pony Raping Main Stream Media), but instead simply assumes that because they don't like the story, the New York Times brainwashing machine is turned up to 11 on it?
Posted by: Jesse at September 19, 2005 03:21 PM (+J9QP)
3
For the record, I don't really care what Clinton has to say about anything in particular. I just find it fascinating that when there is good news to report, the media are usually MIA.
This as positive and hopeful a story as you can find today. But then it might refute the claim that democracy can't work in a Muslim country. And that doesn't fit into the media's template.
Posted by: Gary at September 19, 2005 03:37 PM (PLHs9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
North Korean Pledges To Quit Nuke Program
Now only a fool would completely trust that little buck-toothed punk, Kim Jong Il, at anything he promises, but it turns out that the six-nation negotiations have born at least some fruit - an agreement by North Korea to
dismantle its nook-yoo-lar program. Of course, the North Korean dictator was able to extract its pound of flesh from the U.S. and its Asian allies as part of the bargain - simply put, money. And that of course was the whole point of their nuclear blackmail.
What's most amusing however is that I can recall a certain French-looking Democrat Presidential Candidate who went on and on about how a six-nation negotiation was too complicated and the only way the U.S. could succeed was to deal one-on-one with North Korea. What a genius, huh?
Posted by: Gary at
12:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
More Women Giving Bisexuality A Try...
According to
this story. Could this trend leave men high and dry? No way, scoffs Ace, who
explains why - men are just too damn entertaining!
Posted by: Gary at
06:53 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 38 words, total size 1 kb.
September 18, 2005
Tolkien Geek Update
Fellowship of the Ring, Book One, Chapter Ten
is posted.
Posted by: Gary at
10:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
The New Fall TV Season: What I'll Be Watching...And Why
First off let me point out that having the opportunity to watch any television between changing poopie diapers, reading stories, helping with homework, performing various domestic chores and maintaining two blogs is a miracle unto itself. So if there is a particular show that I watch it's only because I really, really like it or my wife does and I love her enough to endure it so we can share the alone time together.
So there aren't that many to list. And please don't bother making suggestions for anything that doesn't appear below because though I have no doubt it's good, I just don't have the time. Thanks anyway.
Also keep in mind that any specific night and time of broadcast is irrelevant as I'm most likely going to tape it and watch it another time.
more...
Posted by: Gary at
09:00 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 945 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I'm hooked on Battlestar as well. It seemed like a short season, and didn't realize that only half of it is done. I can't believe new episodes won't begin until next year. That's painful.
Posted by: Wordsmith from Nantucket at September 19, 2005 01:44 AM (nrGCx)
2
I used to be a big ER fan, so I know what you mean about it. I finally got fed up when I couldn't keep track of who was who...and there was a bit of Bush bashing...plus I can't stay up that late anymore and I forgot to tape it half the time. So, we've parted company.
I know you don't want suggestions, but my new favorite is "Dirty Jobs" on the Discovery channel.
Posted by: GroovyVic at September 19, 2005 06:20 AM (lsgz8)
3
Re: Boston Legal. Love it. The writing is brilliant, Spader is brilliant, and who knew Shatner could be so amazing in a role. And at least the show has a conservative Republican character.
And you MISS shows? Dude, get TiVO!
Posted by: rightwingprof at September 19, 2005 02:40 PM (hj1Wx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
59kb generated in CPU 0.0381, elapsed 0.1369 seconds.
121 queries taking 0.1135 seconds, 297 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.