January 12, 2006
Gary's rejected candle scent: ![]() Take this quiz at QuizGalaxy.com |
I would have guessed it to be "Stale Hardened Baby Poo". Honestly, some of these things are beyond stupid.
Posted by: Gary at
12:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
An editorial in today's OpinionJournal.com sums it up best:
It's a sign of how little Democrats have on Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito that on Day Three of his confirmation hearings they were still pounding away on his membership in an obscure Princeton alumni group that flowered briefly at the judge's alma mater. They can't touch him on credentials or his mastery of jurisprudence, so they're trying to get him on guilt by ancient association.This wasn't some display for the cameras on the part of Alito's wife. This was genuine emotion from a woman who spent hours upon hours listening to a bunch of hypocrites try to smear her husband and could take it no longer. And anyone who hears or sees this story understands that (even the moonbats, though they'll never admit it). Now anybody that wasn't paying attention before will be aware of the partisan bullying that went on yesterday, and support for this nomination will go up even more.Senators Ted Kennedy and Chuck Schumer did their best yesterday to imply that Judge Alito was racist and sexist by linking the nominee with the views of some members of Concerned Alumni of Princeton, which back in the 1970s and 1980s took issue with university policies on coeducation and affirmative action. The questioning was mean enough that Judge Alito's wife left the hearing room after GOP Senator Lindsey Graham apologized for the comments of his fellow Senators. "Are you really a closet bigot?" Mr. Graham asked the nominee. "No, sir, you're not."
Democrats don't realize it, but by engaging in these underhanded and uncalled-for tactics they're just lowering the bar of their own credibility. If Bush gets to make another Supreme Court appointment in the next three years, it'll be an even harder task for them to try and derail it.
And while I've often taken issue with Sen. Graham, I have to commend him for defense of Sam Alito and his heartfelt apology for the reprehensible behavior of his colleagues on the Committee. There are as many as eight other Senators that owe Alito and his wife an apology. Don't hold your breath waiting for it, though.
UPDATE: From ScotusBlog's Liveblogging report: At 9am -
Specter reconvenes the hearings. Specter reports that in going through boxes of CAP's founder's personal papers, no files, letters, or cancelled checks for Prospect magazine were found with Alito's name on them. No meeting minutes from 1983-84 have Alito's name. The CAP founder has no recollection of Samuel Alito and did not believe Alito was heavily involved in the organization, if at all.Translation: CAP is a non-issue and didn't even need to be brought up considering that all the paperwork that Kennedy wanted to subpoena had already been released and reviewed by the NY Times last month. Nice try, fat loser.
UPDATE II: Michelle Malkin reprints comments about Alito's wife posted on Kos' site by some lower life forms masquerading as human beings. Some examples: "She should go f*** herself" and "What a phony, fraudulent, sheltered twit."
How sad to be so twisted and bitter.
Posted by: Gary at
09:01 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 579 words, total size 4 kb.
January 11, 2006
All in all I don't sense a real aggressive approach on their part in these hearings. John McIntyre at The RCP Blog concurs:
Barring a change of tactics that would have to come soon, it looks like Democrats are giving Alito a pass. I still wouldnÂ’t rule out the possibility of a filibuster, but one would think that if the Democrats' plan was to filibuster, they would be making a more aggressive attempt to paint Alito as out of the mainstream with the hope of peeling away a few moderate Republicans and stiffening the spines of conservative Democrats.I also like how the GOP Senators are taking the opportunity to cogently explain their view of the role of the Supreme Court (for the benefit of the home audience). They've also picked apart the concepts of Roe being an undisputable precedent and relying on foreign law to make Constitutional decisions.What is interesting is when you look at the liberal blogs and what they are talking about, the energy is clearly not on Alito, and that should tell you a lot. I think the left-wing blogosphere is coalescing around the idea Bush and the Republicans are toast based on Abramoff, Iraq and the PresidentÂ’s spying on the American people. They correctly have determined that Alito is a losing battle for them and they are moving on. And I wonder if that is what we are seeing with Senate Democrats as well.
Mark Levin comments on the Dem Senators:
Sam Alito will be confirmed. The only question is how much more damage the Democrats will inflict on themselves during the course of these hearings.And NRO's Bench Memos is keeping score.
UPDATE: A.J. Strata pulls quotes from some KosKids. They're all pissed off because the media isn't piling on Lefty attacks against Alito. Of course the press would if they thought it would make a difference, but they at least have the sense to recognize how stupid the Dems look right now.
UPDATE II: Teddy's been hitting the Chivas (and the Liberal Groups have been no doubt hitting him). He's grasping at the Princeton think. Specter just smacked him down. I suspect there's no substance to this line of attack, but the fat Senator from MA just made sure the MSM got their highlight reel for this evening.
UPDATE III: To John McIntyre's earlier point about the Liberal blogs on Alito. I got an email from MoveOn.org today spurring me to action against the "corrupt Abramoff Republicans". But nary a single word about Alito, the hearings, the Supreme Court...zip, zero, nada.
Posted by: Gary at
11:45 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 490 words, total size 3 kb.
I need to print this out and have the Mrs. read this. She's always busting my chops that it takes me so long to get out of bed in the morning.
Hey, when you go to sleep at night do you conk out as soon as your head hits the pillow? Of course not! Falling asleep is a gradual process. So why shouldn't waking up be thought of in the same way? It doesn't matter how much sleep I get, I can't just bound out of bed and start singing a happy tune like I'm in some musical. Can you? (and damn you if you can!)
Scientists now know it takes somewhere between one and twenty minutes to recover from the effects of sleep inertia. Next they need to figure out exactly how long this period is, and hence how long we need to fully wake up, says Derk-Jan Dijk, director of the Surrey Sleep Research Centre, UK. "That's the crucial point," he says.Cool. Now instead of "five more minutes" I have research that justifies "twenty more minutes"! Or at least "five more minutes" four times.

Posted by: Gary at
11:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 240 words, total size 1 kb.

Drudge has it above the headline "Unstoppable?". It really illustrates the frustration of the Democrat Senators. The talking points and questions provided to them by PFAW, NARAL and other Left-wing interest groups are being casually batted away by Alito like so many annoying mosquitos.
Heh.
Posted by: Gary at
08:48 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
January 10, 2006
Posted by: Gary at
01:39 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
BullDogPundit looks at yesterday's performance, and concludes that the Dems have a losing hand:
There's a saying trial lawyers have that goes something like this: "If you have the facts on your side, argue the facts. If you have the law on your side argue the law. If you haven neither, try to baffle them with bulls*it". Well, it seems pretty clear that since the Dems have neither of the first two on their side in the Alito hearings, they're opting for the latter.John O'Sullivan's take on day one: "Is that all you got?" (I'm paraphrasing, of course).
Certainly overconfidence wouldn't be prudent. But as Dan Balz writes in the WaPo this morning, while activists are riveted the average Joe isn't paying any attention anyway.
LiveBlogging of the hearings here and here.
Posted by: Gary at
10:17 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
Mr. Right got his hands on a final exam from a prestigious program at a famous college - with the answers! Go check it out here and prepare yourself for the require "perspective".
Posted by: Gary at
07:34 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
January 09, 2006
Posted by: Gary at
07:06 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Gary at
07:01 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
A judge can’t have any agenda, a judge can’t have any preferred outcome in any particular case and a judge certainly doesn’t have a client.In other words, rulings should be based on the law and the merits of the case. Not based on whether or not you sympathize with either side, not based on what you think the law should be and certainly not based on how you interpret the way society has "evolved" since the days of the founding fathers or the way other countries handle the issue.The judge’s only obligation — and it’s a solemn obligation — is to the rule of law. And what that means is that in every single case, the judge has to do what the law requires.
Defining "constitutional" is simple. You ask the question, "Is it in the Constitution?" You don't ask "Is it in the Constitution's subtext?" or "Can you find it in the Constitution if you read between the lines?".
A Justice Alito will ask the first question and stop there. Which is why we need him on the Court.
Q&A starts tomorrow morning. 9am.
Posted by: Gary at
04:40 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 1 kb.
See also Michelle Malkin.
Posted by: Gary at
01:39 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 1 kb.
The President is taking the high road. Is his team prepared? We shall see.
UPDATE: 12:15pm - the next three hours will be the opening statements of the committee members, ten minutes each. 100 minutes will be the Republicans and 80 minutes will be the opening salvos from the likes of Chucky Schumer, Teddy Kennedy, Joe Biden and Pat "Leaky" Leahy. Expect Arlen Spector and maybe even Mike DeWine on the GOP side to be low-key in their support, saying they're taking a "wait and see" posture.
But the tone of the Democrat statements will lay the foundation for the smear campaign that will hit the airwaves this week.
If I can find a site that has a good round-up of "notable quotes", I'll be sure to link it.
UPDATE II: Excellent song parody about the Democrat Committee members and their puppet-masters on the Left (to the tune of "The Lonely Goatherd" from The Sound of Music. Check it out here.
Thanks to NRO's "Bench Memos" for the heads-up.
Posted by: Gary at
09:14 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 2 kb.
January 08, 2006
Posted by: Gary at
11:10 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
The GOP is preparing for the smear campaign that launched this morning on the Sunday shows. Follow the Human Events site, AlitoBlog.com for the latest.
Posted by: Gary at
04:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
It's unfortunate that their season had to end in their own stadium on such a sour note. But the season was pretty much over as far as I was concerned. It's time the boys got some well earned rest. Time to re-tool the linebacking corp and the secondary. We have a draft to plan for.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, the Giants played it close than I would have liked last week. The Raiders were not about to lay down and gave New York a competitive game. But in the end the Giants did what they had to do.
As I've said before, at this point in the season my expectations going in have been exceeded. But reality is a bitch. The Giants just aren't good enough to go all the way. I think being at home, the Giants have a better than 50/50 chance today. Despite the injuries on defense, I think they can hold their own. But while Coach Coughlin may be tempted to air it out today, they should learn a lesson from a couple of weeks ago when Dallas beat the Panthers on the ground. If the offensive line can just keep the false starts to a minimum, Tiki Barber can get 30+ touches this afternoon. If he does, he will wear out Carolina's defense and the Giants will win.
New York needs to avoid turnovers at all costs. If they give the Panthers the opportunity, Carolina will make the most of it.
There are about twenty some-odd players who've never experienced a playoff game. It would experience for them to have at least one win under their belt heading into next season.
Posted by: Gary at
09:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 354 words, total size 2 kb.
Shortly after the 1998 election, the party decided that having Newt Gingrich continue as the Majority Leader was not helping, so after a lot of internal pressure, Gingrich stepped down and Denny Hastert picked up the gavel. The result: the Democrats lost a target to lob their attacks against. Hastert's integrity was beyond approach.
Today, the GOP has a similar opportunity. And in the uncertainty of the Abramoff case - which will taint all of Congress, across party lines - they need to put forth a Majority Leader whose career isn't synonymous with the lobbying corruption of "K Street" and take the higher ground away from Democrats, who will try to claim it for themselves.
Red State makes the case for Mike Pence.
At a time when Democrats are trying to paint Republicans as unethical greedy crooks in the pockets of Jack Abramoff and his ilk, Republicans in Congress should look to one who is willing to work for the party, but who is not willing to give up the fight for the conservative base. Republicans need to start looking for a "do as I do" Republican and not continue on with hypocrits of power.As of now, the leading candidates are Roy Blunt of MO and John Boehner of OH - each is a candidate that is exactly what the party DOESN'T need right now. Hopefully, the Republican Caucus in the House do some serious reflection over the next few weeks and, if a special election is called to fill the post, create enough of a groundswell to draft Pence as the new Majority Leader.Right now the House Republicans need Mike Pence. He's done wonders revitalizing the Republican Study Committee. It has become an effective organization. There are others there like Jeb Hensarling, who can keep it going. There are not many in the Republican ranks who can revitalize Republican leadership in the House as a whole. Mike Pence can and Mike Pence should be given the opportunity.
Stay tuned.
Posted by: Gary at
09:00 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.
January 07, 2006
Birth Name: Same
Birth Date: 1/7/50
Age Today: 56 (Happy Birthday!)
Birthplace: Honolulu, HI

80's Crush because: She was "out of this world" from 1979-1981 as sexy satin flight-suit wearing space pilot Col. Wilma Deering in the TV show "Buck Rogers in the 25th Century". Boy, did I want to settle into her cockpit.

Other notable roles: Kate Stratton in "Silver Spoons" which, ironically, I never watched because I couldn't stand that little bastard Ricky Schroder.
Most recent media appearance: Some film called "Meat Pie". Hmmm.
Distinguishing Feature: Killer Smile - with dimples.
Interesting Factoid: Erin started her career as a model featured in commercials for Breck, Clairol and Camay Soap.
Career moment she'd probably like to forget: Being the victim of an "energy vampire" in one of the cheesiest episodes of "Buck Rogers" ever.

Crush Meter: 8 out of 10
Posted by: Gary at
09:00 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Gary at
08:43 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
January 06, 2006
As Mr. Spock would say, "Fascinating".
Note: I'm angry at myself because when I stumbled upon it I had bookmarked it for reading later and forgot to note the referring source. If it's you, please leave a comment and I'll be sure to credit you! Apologies in advance.
Posted by: Gary at
07:45 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
122 queries taking 0.0837 seconds, 298 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.