October 03, 2006
How's your 401K doin' these days?
Posted by: Gary at
04:10 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Thankfully, it turns out that the article isn't referring to Howard Dean. Whew. That's a relief. We need this guy right where he is.
Posted by: Gary at
11:21 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.

"So, how's it going on the campaign trail, Liebs, old pal? Looking forward to keeping that seniority are we? Wink, wink. Nudge, nudge. Say no more?"
The nutroots, of course, sees this as a betrayal. And I don't blame them.
Tom Matzzie, the Washington director of MoveOn.org, a liberal advocacy group that supports Lamont, said Lieberman may be spreading false information to make himself a more attractive candidate.Seems to me that Reid and co. not only see the writing on the wall in terms of Lamont's viability but they're also making preparations should the Senate make-up end up in a tie - 49-49-2.“This is a Lieberman campaign tactic,” he said. “Democratic leaders are supporting Ned Lamont.”
Bill Grad, who sits on the Democratic Town Council of Greenwich, Conn., LamontÂ’s home town, said Lieberman has very actively distanced himself from the Democratic Party, and that it was wrong of leaders to promise anything.
“Why should Reid tell the guy in advance that he’ll have his seniority. If it comes to that, that’s fine. But it’s disappointing, it’s greatly disappointing that he would be given assurances.”
It'll be interesting to read the Lefty blogs in the coming days.
Posted by: Gary at
09:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 246 words, total size 2 kb.
Here's the funny part. Up until this moment, Liberals have considered the low-circulation daily to be nothing more than a GOP talking points rag and derided it every chance they would get.
Now watch them laud the paper for its profile in courage.
Bunk. Don Surber has hit the nail on the head here. The Times is taking the opportunity to force Republicans to clean house:
The Washington Times has an agenda to push the Republican Party further to the right, rendering it as useless as the lefty-dominated Democratic Party.Yes, the Right has its Kos-sacks, too.There is no appeasing these loons on either side.
It's a fact that the Times often features the side of the story that the Washington Post and the NY Times won't. And I've often linked them to support my own arguments, as I will continue to do.
But this kind of a move, without the benefit of a full investigation, is ridiculous. And the fact that they leaked it to Drudge the night before to get the buzz going is indicitive of the agenda of their editorial board - a party purge.
Expect more from the ranks of the hard Right to echo the Times' demand. These are also the people who think it benefits the GOP in the long run to lose now so they can win later, with a more "ideologically pure" slate of candidates. Sound familiar? Maybe like the Ned Lamont supporters?
Sorry, guys. But losing is for losers. Not to mention the fact that the stakes are just too high.
Speaker Hastert would do well to ignore them.
UPDATE:
...or better yet, as Hugh Hewitt advises: "Don't Resign, Speaker Hastert. Swing Back."
Posted by: Gary at
07:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 301 words, total size 2 kb.
October 02, 2006
Now if someone on the other side had these IMs and held onto them until five weeks before an election, they had better leave the country or there'll be hell to pay if they're found out.
Lorie Byrd at Wizbang has the money quote here:
If it is learned that a Democrat has been holding those IMs for any period of time for political purposes, the backlash could be as nasty as those disgusting messages.It would make the Wellstone Memorial backlash seem like a non-event.
UPDATE:
Thanks to Scrapiron for the tip below. The link is here.
Posted by: Gary at
04:40 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 168 words, total size 1 kb.
Fox started showing the season in repeats back in June but oddly decided to abandon this schedule in favor of a Friday night movie-of-the-week format, showing such cinematic classics as "Bringing Down The House" with Steve Martin and Queen Latifah. Sigh.
Anyway, for those who missed any episodes (or like me, most of season five) this is your chance to catch up.
A&E looks to be broadcasting three episodes every Monday at 8am, 9am & 10am and later at 2pm, 3pm & 4pm. Series episodes 97, 98 & 99 (or season five episodes 1, 2 & 3) begin Monday, October 16th.
If this eight week schedule holds, they should be finished by December 4th. Season five will be released on DVD on December 5th. What timing, eh?
Posted by: Gary at
11:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 156 words, total size 1 kb.

OKTOBERFEST!
So go grab a couple of these and enjoy.
The beers, I mean.
Posted by: Gary at
10:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
That being said, as the bigger story begins to spread to the GOP leadership who supposedly "knew" he was a pedophile, there's something about this that feels awfully familiar. Like Rathergate. The timing of this story is really suspicious.
And just as they did two years ago, the blogoshere is smelling a rat and doing some extensive analysis of the way this went down.
Both Curt at Flopping Aces and Mark at Decision '08 have found some sources for that smell. Go read through what they've found.
Posted by: Gary at
07:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 129 words, total size 1 kb.
118 queries taking 0.092 seconds, 256 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








