October 07, 2005

More "RINO" Rage

Cassandra at Villainous Company takes on those Miers whiners. Quite well, in fact. And she uses bell curves and other stat thingies. What's not to like? A long post, but well worth reading.

Posted by: Gary at 03:49 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.

That $%$&#*@ McCain!

Though the veins on Mark Levin's forehead are still throbbing incessantly, he acknowledges the role that the John McCain's "Gang of 14" may have played in the Miers nomination by keeping the judicial filibuster tactic alive. more...

Posted by: Gary at 10:43 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 445 words, total size 3 kb.

October 06, 2005

I've Got Your "Base" Right Here

Wow. You want hostility? I'll give you hostility. Beth at My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy has had it up to here with George Will. And she has a few choice words for those shrieking Conservatives throwing hissy-fits over the Miers nomination.

Not for the faint-hearted or profanity-averse. But an excellent post. When folks on the Right say "we" elected George W. Bush, they need to remember that 62 million Americans voted for him and that number represents a very diverse group.

Posted by: Gary at 03:07 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 93 words, total size 1 kb.

Quote Of The Day

From James Lileks, on the Conservative punditry:

TheyÂ’re never happy nowadays. These were the people who caught a whiff of Souterism in John RobertÂ’s nomination, and wouldnÂ’t be happy unless a nominee announced his intention to back Souter into a corner in the cloakroom and give him a turbo-wedgie every day.
That visual is absolutely killing me here.

Hat Tip to Hugh Hewitt

Posted by: Gary at 11:21 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

Conservatives Won't Trust Bush, But They'll Trust The Senate?

It's been several days since the President nominated Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court and many Conservatives are still fuming. George Will's op-ed yesterday, while well argued, was a shot across the White House's bow that may have made the situation worse by handing Democrats plenty of non-ideological arguments that they can use during her confirmation hearings.

The emotion being felt on the Right is understandable, but as we move forward I think we need to step back a bit and do some serious reflection over this matter. There are a lot of things about Miers that we do not know, true. But there are many things about this whole process that we also do not know. more...

Posted by: Gary at 08:28 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 801 words, total size 5 kb.

October 05, 2005

The "Strategery" Of Harry Reid

One of the biggest gripes I've been reading around the Conservative Blogosphere the last couple of days is about the praise that Sen. Minority Leader Harry Reid has been heaping on Harriet Miers. The rationale seems to be "Look! If Reid likes her, Bush really looks like a fool!" Frankly, a lot of folks on the Right would much rather see Reid lose his shit on the Senate floor over a nomination.

Well, guess what people? Reid knows this all to well and he's playing it to the hilt. He gushed even more about Miers yesterday. I'm sure his hope is that if he can goad the Right into doing his job for him, by discrediting her, his battle is half won. Hell, maybe the Republican Senators can make better arguments against her than Democrats can.

Who cares if Reid says he "likes her"? He said he "liked" John Roberts only minutes before he voted against him. All Reid is doing is setting Miers up so he can later say, "Gee, I did like Harriet Miers until it become clear to me that she [fill in the complaint here]. It's such a shame I can no longer support her nomination."

This is a game that Harry Reid and the Democrats are starting to figure out how to play. Should we really be helping him? The die is cast. Miers is the nominee and that's not going to change. It seems foolish to be ripping her this early in the process. Vent if you will, but remember that what you say can and will be used against her during the hearings.

Posted by: Gary at 11:13 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 276 words, total size 2 kb.

"Grounding" The Court

Texas Senator John Cornyn has on op-ed in OpinionJournal.com this morning in support of Miers. He brings up several aspects of her resume that have been thus far overlooked.

And he makes an interesting point that reinforces what folks like "the Great One" Mark Levin have been saying recently about the courts in general and SCOTUS in particular (see Levin's excellent book "Men In Black"):

It is true that she was not educated at East Coast universities and has not spent her entire career inside the Beltway. This, again, is a plus in my book, not a minus. Anyone who has followed the Supreme Court in recent years knows that what the institution needs most is a dose of life beyond Washington. Last year, the court permitted a public display of the Ten Commandments in Texas, but not in Kentucky. It took nine justices on the court 10 different opinions to explain why this was so. The court is dangerously out of touch with America. Ms. Miers will help bring it back down to earth.
I think as we learn more about Harriet Miers, such fierce opponents as Levin may get a better comfort level with her. Of course, I'm not holding my breath.

UPDATE: 10:20am
Tony Blankely is reluctantly signing on.

As in life, so in politics, if one seeks disappointment one will surely find it. And conservatives have not had to look hard this week to find the gloom. But it is the disappointment of an unrequited ardor, of a not yet fully consummated passion. Such youthful vigor inevitably finds its satisfaction.

Consider, in the alternative, the deeper disappointment that liberals contemplate in this dreary autumn of their aspirations.

The last remaining champions of their principles sit aged and infirm on the high bench -- their former brilliance now brittle and susceptible to being chiseled and crumbled by even the most modest conservative laborers.

Victory may not be heroic, but it will be ours.

Again, let's go "big picture" here.

Posted by: Gary at 09:00 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 334 words, total size 2 kb.

October 04, 2005

Doubting Thomas

Drudge links this 1991 National Review article that actually refers to Clarence Thomas as "Souteresque". WTF?

Posted by: Gary at 09:48 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.

Tuesday Morning Perspective From Patrick Ruffini

Are conservatives not seeing the forest, here? Pat Ruffini lays it out the way he sees it:

Some would prefer a nominee in a more esoteric, elitist, or eccentric mold, with the penmanship of a Scalia. Harriet Miers will not be the flashiest Justice – but nor will she make leaps of logic that sometimes lead her in unconservative and unpredictable directions (see McConnell on polygamy, or Scalia on pornography). This is not the time to act like preening Ivory Tower elitists, but to call Harry Reid's bluff. Miers will cast the votes that O'Connor wouldn't. And that's all that matters.
Here's what I know: more...

Posted by: Gary at 08:49 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 907 words, total size 6 kb.

October 03, 2005

Is Harriet Miers A "Trojan Horse"?

Taking what Dick Cheney told Rush Limbaugh today ("Trust Us") along with the myriad of opinion on this nomination and mixing it in with what I have observed of Bush over the last five years, I have a whacky theory here.

Bush knows Harriet Miers as well as anyone. She was his personal attorney. Through their friendship (and under the protection of the Attorney-Client privilege) I would imagine that they've discussed every political issue under the sun as it relates to the judiciary.

She has no paper trail. Conservatives are losing their minds. Liberals are breathing a sigh of relief.

What if...

Harriet Miers gets confirmed without having to reveal any opinion on any particular case - thanks to Roberts. Then, once on the bench for the rest of her life, she goes full Right-Wing Ninja?

Just a thought. This White House doesn't do anything without considering the long-term implications. Five years from now, will Miers be the new "darling" of Conservatives on the Supreme Court, surpassing even Scalia and Thomas?

Hey, it's the only thing that makes sense. It's so...Rovian!

Posted by: Gary at 04:20 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 193 words, total size 1 kb.

Revolt On The Right?

Wow. This one seems to be melting down fast. It's becoming more and more apparent that Miers may be unacceptable to enough Conservatives as to lead to a rejection in the Senate. The comparisons to LBJ's nomination of Abe Fortas are flying fast and furious.

Michelle Malkin has the best round-up and Memeorandum has many, many links.

It's starting to look to these eyes that this was a tremendous political blunder if for no other reason than the position this will put GOP Senators in. After lambasting Democrats for voting against Roberts on purely ideological grounds, many Republicans in the Senate will look like they are doing exactly the same thing (though to put this in perspective, Miers' lack of experience as a judge is a major factor as well).

This is probably worse than a Gonzales nomination. If Dems are smart, they will just step back and let this play-out. Of course, since they aren't they're sure to jump right in.

Ouch. Can we get a "do-over" here?

UPDATE: Drudge reports Miers gave $$ to Clinton/Gore. The final nail?

UPDATE II: Confirm Them "confirms" that the above is just a false rumor. While she did give to Gore in '88, she never gave to Clinton.

It seems Miers is a recovering Democrat like myself.

All this hysteria reminds me of that scene in Airplane, when the flight attendant announces that they're out of coffee.

UPDATE III:
Hugh Hewitt and BeldarBlog are appealing for calm. Their perspectives are very well worth considering.

Posted by: Gary at 11:00 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.

Initial Buzz On Miers

It will take a little while for the smoke to clear and be able to look at this one with some perspective, but the initial reaction from Conservatives ranges from confusion to outrage.

Keep in mind that in the first hours (and even days) following the announcement of Roberts there were similar rumblings of discontent (remember how apoplectic Ann Coutler got?). That Miers is a Conservative is not really in doubt. But the general feeling I'm getting from the Right side of the Blogosphere is that this was a blown opportunity to appoint someone in the Scalia/Thomas mold and that it's at best 50/50 that Bush will get a chance to make an third appointment before his term runs out.

This is going to be an interesting week.

Posted by: Gary at 10:15 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.

It's Miers

One of the biggest concerns the Left had about Bush's next nominee was that - like Roberts - he or she would be a "stealth" nominee. That is to say they feared getting a nominee without a record of decisions or public statements. For this would would make it very difficult to portray that nominee to the American public as "extreme".

Well, they got stealth in spades here. While her legal credentials are OK, she has never been a judge. And Roberts already reinforced the Ginsberg precedent of not commenting on specific cases.

So where does that leave the Left? First and foremost expect them to paint Miers as a Bush crony who will be influenced by her loyalty to the President when deciding any case. It's already started. The Washington Post, in its article announcing Miers' nomination reports that here Bush is "reaching into his loyal inner circle for another pick that could reshape the nation's judiciary for years to come." more...

Posted by: Gary at 08:58 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 360 words, total size 2 kb.

<< Page 2 of 2 >>
40kb generated in CPU 0.0184, elapsed 0.0763 seconds.
117 queries taking 0.066 seconds, 254 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.